That's debatable: 2 dining tables versus one/Off Duty, The Wall Street Journal

That's debatable: 2 dining tables versus one/Off Duty, The Wall Street Journal - Rima Suqi

Are two dining tables better than one? Designers debate this polarizing topic.

Joe Nahem, Fox Nahem, Kristen McGinnis, Chris Coleman, Michelle Gerson, Coleman + Sanchez, Viktor Udzenija, Benjamin Norieta Ortiz

6988

single,single-post,postid-6988,single-format-standard,do-etfw,ajax_fade,page_not_loaded,,qode-title-hidden,qode-child-theme-ver-1.0.0,qode-theme-ver-9.1.3,wpb-js-composer js-comp-ver-5.4.7,vc_responsive

Rima Suqi, Thats Debatable, WSJ, 2 Dining Tables

14 Feb That’s debatable: 2 dining tables versus one/Off Duty, The Wall Street Journal

Posted at 09:34h in Uncategorized by Rima Suqi

Are two dining tables better than one? It’s a polarizing topic, debated in this weekend’s Off Duty section of the Wall Street Journal. You can read the entire article here (paywall) with opinions by Joe Nahem, Benjamin Noriega Ortiz and Kristen McGinnis on the PRO side and Viktor Udzenija, Christopher Coleman and Michelle Gerson on the CON side.

14 Feb That’s debatable: 2 dining tables versus one/Off Duty, The Wall Street Journal

CONTACT

SEARCH

FOLLOW